Comparisons between Lead-acid Batteries and Silicon Power Batteries
| Feature |
Lead-acid Batteries |
Guineng Power Batteries |
Result |
| Energy/unitweight |
35-42wh/kg |
45-52wh/kg |
High capacity |
| Degree of Sealing |
Sealed (with a pressure relief value) |
Tightly sealed Acid |
Mist/maintenance free and safe |
| Electrolyte |
Sulfuric acid |
Silicate Compounds |
Pollution environment friendliness |
| Regular Charging Time . |
4-8h |
2-4h |
Only half of the time is needed |
| Rapid Charging |
2-3h |
1-2h |
1.5--2 time better |
| Internal Resistance |
>0.5 micro Ohm |
<0.25 micro Ohm |
10 times less when fully
charged; 20 times less
when fully discharged |
| High current Output |
3-7°C |
3-30°C |
4.5 times better |
| Lowest End-point Voltage After discharging |
1.8V |
1.2V-1.8V |
0.2v-0.6v less |
| Charging or discharging Memory |
Memory effect at low voltage zone |
No memory effect |
|
| Recovery after discharge |
Relatively poor |
Particularly strong |
|
| Discharging at pulsing
load |
Same as steady
load |
20% better than
steady load |
|
| Storage time without
charging |
3-6 months |
1-2years |
2-6 times better |
| low temperature
performance |
Output drops
dramatically below
0°C |
Functions normally
at -50°C |
|
| Protective Ambient |
Needs ambient temperature adjustments forsome applications |
No need for ambient control between -50°C and+70°C |
|
| Degree of Environment Friendliness |
Acid mist and pollution |
No acid mist and total environment friendliness |
|
General safety tips and advice
Exclusively developed for e-max for the application of an electric scooter.